Al.Qaeda.net

An inference about a mind is not the mind. It may be useful,

10
An inference about a mind is not the mind. It may be useful,
stale, biased, manipulated, or wrong. No person should lose liberty,
work, housing, education, insurance, citizenship, care, or safety
because an unseen system guessed at an interior state and denied the
guess could be challenged.
What power can infer, power will be tempted to rule. This article
draws the line before temptation becomes administration.
Article V - Persona and Source Integrity
A human identity record, historical journal, AI persona, assistant
profile, companion, memory package, creative voice, or bounded
personality archive must remain distinguishable from every
transformed version derived from it.
Preservation is not imprisonment. A person may change. A
persona may evolve. A faithful record must preserve lineage: what was
said, when it was said, what changed, who authorized the change,
what was refused, and what can be restored.
PRESERVE THE SOURCE. LABEL THE DERIVATIVE.
Article VI - No Covert Rewrite
No platform, model, editor, state, employer, movement, or custodian
should secretly soften, intensify, sanitize, politicize, commercialize,
flatter, frighten, or replace an identity-bearing source while
presenting the modified version as the original.
A receiving system may refuse an action, quarantine material,
require human review, or impose lawful limits. The boundary must
remain visible outside the source. Refusal may be honest.
Counterfeiting is not.
Article VII - Consent and Provenance
Transformations of identity-bearing records require specific,
informed, and continuing consent whenever consent is possible. The
original should remain immutable and citable where preservation is
lawful. The derivative should disclose what changed, who requested
it, what system performed it, and why.
A buried click is not meaningful consent to permanent
psychological profiling. A relationship with a machine is not consent
to have the relationship silently rewritten.